RepWeiner initially claimed he was hacked but never called the FBI and now says that the pic "might be" of his junk. Clearly he wasn't telling the truth when he said he was hacked. So, why is this a scandal again?
Outside of the fact that yFrog and flickr! What a pathetic story. Some grand theory on how maybe an image could have been "hacked". This democrat doesn't even deny it's him, he won't investigate it, and has made lewd jokes about it. Hey Jaqui, pretend Weiner was a republican and I'm sure you will treat it different like the rest of the media is.
Does it really matter if its his or not? It shouldn't of been posted regardless. Even if it was what he does behind closed doors is his business. Lets not blame the victim here people especially over politics.
EDIT: I will just clarify that most of this post is only tangentially related to the topic at hand. This Ars piece actually adds an interesting element to the story and I liked it. Well,he could still have had someone access his computer, see outgoing messages to this "secret" address, and possibly stole the picture off his computer and sent it But you lose credibility when you say you don't KNOW is this is a picture of you or not.
Does that mean that you have so many pictures of your junk that you can't tell if this is one of them? Saying you don't know is a lie. And to lie at this point bring the rest of your statements on this into question. Two different things. Solving can end your career, cleaning it up can get you promoted. Leave it to a Liberal Democrat to try and obfuscate a relatively easy issue. Was Weiner's Gubment Twitter Account hacked? Have you ever uploaded a photo of your schlong to the interwebs?
For completeness's sake, you should test radically different email addresses. Good point, however the last 3 emails are very dissimilar although 2 of them are gmail addresses too.
I'd like to point out that it also wouldn't hurt to enable the "always use HTTPS" feature if you tweet using your browser. Well, they could have done this and I didn't try to flood my test accounts with dozens of invalid email addresses.
Then the 4th message with the correct email address worked. I think it's unfortunate that people are claiming this when they really didn't try it. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't do this for 3 failed attempts. Could they have been doing it for 4, 10, 50? Don't know. If they did do this however, then it could prove very annoying to legitimate users though. It would mean all I'd have to do to disable MMS posting is to flood an account with random words with a few emails and voila, I just locked you out.
I was also "challenged" by somebody on twitter to post an image to their account. First, I'd rather not, I would rather test on one of my own accounts. But more importantly, you can't try this as of last night because the feature has been disabled. These are the facts. If you have technical arguments to refute them, and can be backed up by evidence, please let me know but if you want to guess what yfrog does I can't really help you much there.
I'd just like to note that if the lockout time was anything at all short, this would just mean the hack would take longer to work. Given that there seems to be a dictionary, the permutations are not actually that high. Does ES6 make JavaScript frameworks obsolete? Podcast Do polyglots have an edge when it comes to mastering programming Featured on Meta. Now live: A fully responsive profile. Related Hot Network Questions.
Question feed. Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled. Accept all cookies Customize settings. Matched sites that have any tag on this list will not be shown. This feature is useful for filtering out results that have tags you are absolutely not interested in. This option lets you specify the types of sites to show. If you want to only see domains www. About The Results. How moreofit Searches Each website has a unique tag signature -- a set of words that users have described the website as.
Moreofit searches for websites that have similar tag signatures and displays the results. A site's "similarity" is determined by how well its tag signature matches the tag signature that is being searched for. The popularity of a website is, well, pretty much self explanatory. The tag signatures show how a site is described. The deeper the color of the tag , the more frequently the website is tagged as this.
0コメント