So far, Articulate Storyline is only a winner when it comes to importing PowerPoint content. And Adobe Captivate scores higher with virtual reality, responsive content, and Adobe Photoshop import. Both authoring tools work equally well with Cluelabs widgets and software simulations and generally support modern eLearning trends.
Here are some questions that can help you decide which tool will better meet your needs:. The interface in Storyline is cleaner and easier to use intuitively. The user interface in Captivate is less convenient and takes a bit longer to get used to, but overall, once you learn it, you will have no issues working with it.
If you are planning to create custom interactions, Storyline might be a better option for you. If you, however, are more interested in out-of-the-box functionality, you may like Captivate.
Both tools will allow you to program custom interactions, interactive elements, complex scenarios, etc. While Captivate provides more preview options, Storyline wins with output options, which can often be a deal-breaker. In addition, careful placement and alignment of slide objects take less time and effort in Storyline.
If you are trying to decide which tool is right for you, it will be helpful to take a look at the list of features provided in this guide and take note of how each authoring tools scores on the features that are important to you and are key in the project you are working on. Articulate Storyline is better when it comes to importing PowerPoint content. Both Articulate Storyline and Adobe Captivate can each offer unique features not provided by the other tool.
Just by looking at the scoring provided in this article, you can see that Articulate Storyline is a superior product to Adobe Captivate. Storyline offers more flexibility and easier workflow. However, Adobe Captivate does have a few unique features that may be important for your project. We strongly prefer to use Articulate Storyline due to its easy-to-use interface and modern eLearning development tools it offers.
Adobe Captivate also has its own strengths, but because of poor performance, outdated interface, and low productivity, it lags behind Storyline. Skip to content Storyline vs. Adobe Captivate allows creating basic virtual reality eLearning projects. Storyline will allow you to select dimensions, video and audio quality, and other options. You have the ability to publish the eLearning project as a video in the MP4 format.
The presets and publishing settings will allow you to set the output quality. Responsive content While the player itself is responsive and adjusts based on the screen size, the eLearning content, however, always looks the same no matter the device. Responsive eLearning projects are supported and work well with different types of devices, content can adjust based on the screen size.
Software simulation Storyline provides a set of tools to record, edit, and display software simulations. Software simulations are supported in Captivate equally well. PowerPoint import Users have the ability to import slides from a PowerPoint presentation. Prior to importing, Storyline will display a two-dimensional grid showing all slides in the presentation to help the user select only those slides that are needed.
Slide content is converted into Storyline objects text boxes, shapes, etc. This means that content cannot be edited directly in Captivate, any edits have to go through PowerPoint, which adds extra steps to the process and makes the development process less convenient. Adobe Photoshop import There are currently no options to import assets directly from Adobe Photoshop. The assets can be imported from Photoshop.
Upon import, they are laid out on the screen as they were positioned in the Photoshop file, saving time on content positioning and alignment. Furthermore, the edits you make later in Photoshop can propagate directly to Captivate, saving you time and effort.
Here are some questions that can help you decide which tool will better meet your needs: Will I need to import PowerPoint content into my eLearning course? Do I plan to create virtual reality-based training programs, are my learners and organization ready for this type of content? If I need virtual reality compatibility, will I be satisfied with a limited set of VR features?
Will my learners access eLearning from mobile devices as well as desktops? If I expect the learners to use mobile devices for learning, will they do this often enough to justify the longer time needed to create responsive learning projects? Will I design slides in Photoshop prior to creating the learning course? If so, how important is it to be able to import designs directly into the authoring tools?
Minimal use of pop-up windows. Menus and buttons are clearly captioned. Working with objects can get confusing because of over-reliance on the Properties panel. Software responsiveness The application responds well to user requests and features minimal lag and wait time when an operation is initiated.
It often takes a few seconds to render a new element, paste an object, etc. During this time the application freezes until the action is completed. Multiple projects handling Multiple projects can be open at the same time. However, each project opens in its own application window. Multiple projects are shown as tabs of the same application similar to other Adobe software you may have used in the past.
Workspace customization Panels can be resized and moved around, but cannot be completely hidden. The user can hide the panels, but cannot move them around the workspace. Tooltips Hovering the mouse pointer over buttons and options brings up helpful tooltips.
No tooltips in the properties panel where the most confusion usually occurs. Workspace zoom Allows to zoom in, zoom out, fit slide to window size. Zooming in and out can only be done by selecting pre-defined zoom percentages.
Allows to fit slide to window size. Branching view Slides are arranged according to branching logic in both the story view and the slide view.
To see the branching sequence, the user needs to open a menu, select an option, which will open a new window. This makes the workflow involving triggers smart and intuitive. Because the user can work on both the slide objects and the triggers at the same time, the development process becomes easy and intuitive. In order to define advanced actions, the user has to open another panel.
This panel not only blocks the slide, but also makes it impossible to interact with the objects on the slide until the advanced action is saved and the window is closed. Summary: User Experience Storyline points, Captivate points The interface in Storyline is cleaner and easier to use intuitively.
Here are some questions that can help you decide which tool will better meet your needs: Do I have time for the learning curve to occur or do I need to jump right into the authoring tool and start developing?
Will I be able to create effective eLearning courses using a less convenient interface? Is my computer powerful enough to work without lag and freezing when performing operations?
Is it important to see branching logic at all times while designing the course? Will I use triggers or advanced actions, and if so, how important is it to be able to work in an intuitive interface? Articulate Storyline 3 is a robust tool that has enormous content creating capabilities, but it takes a lot of time to explore all of them.
This toolkit works great for large eLearning departments where there are all levels of developers, both beginner and expert, and all levels of course complexity are required. You can try Articulate Storyline 3 free for 30 days. Rating: 3. Adobe Captivate is a standalone eLearning authoring solution which is suited both for solving simple training tasks creating a presentation or a test and for developing complex interactive courses.
It has robust capabilities for creating Virtual Reality VR projects, and making interactive videos and studio-quality HD videos by simultaneously recording webcam and on-screen content.
It will definitely require some skill and time. A wide range of interactions is another strong feature of the toolkit. You can make eLearning fun with drag-and-drops, puzzles, games, and other interactions.
Captivate license holders can find images, people cutouts, themes, scenarios, VR environments, interactions, and other assets for creating eLearning content, in Adobe Stock and its Content Library. One of the main focuses of this toolkit is creating mobile courses, with a feature that lets you customize output content for all types of devices and screen sizes.
Given that fact, there are some unique features whose purpose is to create a better mobile experience. For example, the tool supports geolocation, and has special variables that can be used in your mobile course. For instance, in geography courses, you can show learners the symbol of the city where they live. Adobe Captivate is a powerful tool that uses new future-ready technologies. It has great capabilities for delivering progressive learning experiences, but comes with a steep learning curve.
Captivate is better suited for advanced eLearning instructional designers than for novice or intermediate-level specialists. Adobe Activate is also available by subscription.
You can download and install a free day trial version of Adobe Captivate. Every eLearning authoring tool has its pros and cons. More importantly, each of the reviewed software aims for different goals and different audiences. Still, we can state what each of the authoring tools is best suited for. If your authoring experience is causing you headaches and forces you to deal with technical issues instead of making cool learning content, perhaps trying another tool would be a better option.
All the tools mentioned here offer free trials, so we invite you to dig in and discover which one is the best tool for you! If you want to produce content without consulting tech-savvy specialists and spending time on training, start with an iSpring Suite day trial and explore all its features right away. We use cookies in order to personalize your experience, display relevant advertising, offer social media sharing capabilities and analyze our website's performance. Cookie Preferences.
How can we help you? Something Has Gone Terribly Wrong. Please Try Later. Sign In. How we use LinkedIn. We also use this access to retrieve the following information: Your full name. Your primary email address. You can revoke this access at any time through your LinkedIn account. Sign In with LinkedIn.
Already have an account? Login here.
0コメント